Implementasi Fuzzy Logic Control pada Pelacakan Panel Surya
Abstract
A dynamic solar panel equipped with a fuzzy-method tracking system has been developed to improve its performance. In this solar panel with tracking system, the voltage and current of the solar panels were used as inputs for the fuzzy algorithms. From observations for seven days, dynamic and static solar panels produced the highest voltage of 21.65 V and 20.13 V, as well the highest current of 0.58 A and 0.54 A respectively. Dynamic solar panel could produce an average voltage of 19% and an average current of 16% higher than static solar panels. The length time of battery charging on a dynamic solar panel was one hour shorter than that of static solar panel.
Panel surya dinamis yang dilengkapi sistem pelacakan dengan metoda fuzzy telah dikembangkan untuk meningkatkan kinerjanya. Dalam panel surya dengan sistem pelacakan ini, tegangan dan arus dari panel surya digunakan sebagai input untuk fuzzy algorithms. Dari pengamatan selama tujuh hari, panel surya dinamis dan statis menghasilkan berturut-turut tegangan tertinggi 21,65 V dan 20,13 V, serta arus 0,58 A dan 0,54 A. Panel surya dinamis dapat menghasilkan tegangan rata-rata 19% dan arus rata-rata 16% lebih tinggi daripada panel surya statis. Lama waktu pengisian baterai pada panel surya dinamis satu jam lebih singkat daripada panel surya statis.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
V. Sumathi, R. Jayapragash, A. Bakshi, and P. Kumar Akella, “Solar tracking methods to maximize PV system output – A review of the methods adopted in recent decade”, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 74, no. July, pp. 130–138, 2017.
C. J. Yang, “Reconsidering solar grid parity,” Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 3270–3273, 2010.
V. Poulek and M. Libra, “New solar tracker,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 113–120, 1998.
K. K. Tse, M. T. Ho, H. S. H. Chung, and S. Y. R. Hui, “A novel maximum power point tracker for PV panels using switching frequency modulation,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 980–989, 2002.
H. S. H. Chung, K. K. Tse, S. Y. Ron Hui, C. M. Mok, and M. T. Ho, “A novel maximum power point tracking technique for solar panels using a SEPIC or Cuk converter,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 717–724, 2003.
A. Pandey, N. Dasgupta, and A. K. Mukerjee, “High-performance algorithms for drift avoidance and fast tracking in solar MPPT system,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 681–689, 2008.
F. Chekired, C. Larbes, D. Rekioua, and F. Haddad, “Implementation of a MPPT fuzzy controller for photovoltaic systems on FPGA circuit,” Energy Procedia, vol. 6, pp. 541–549, 2011.
D. C. Huynh and M. W. Dunnigan, “Development and comparison of an improved incremental conductance algorithm for tracking the MPP of a solar PV panel,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1421–1429, 2016.
M. A. Kumar, S. A. K. Jilani, U. Sreenivasulu, and S. J. Hussain, “Automated Color Recognition System for Visually Challenged and Achromatopsia People using Arduino and Mobile App,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Electron. Commun. Eng., vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 2106–2110, 2015.
M. D. Khairunnas, E. Ariyanto, and S. Prabowo, “Design and implementation of smart bath water heater using Arduino,” in 2018 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology, ICoICT 2018, 2018.
Lady Ada, “Adafruit INA219 Current Sensor Breakout Why the High Side”, Adafruit learning system, 2019.
“Zerø-Drift, Bi-Directional CURRENT /POWER MONITOR with I 2 CTM Interface Check for Samples: INA219 1FEATURES,” 2008.
“Hobby Servo Tutorial - learn.sparkfun.com.” .
L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy algorithms,” Inf. Control, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 94–102, 1968.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37209/jtbbt.v9i1.107
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Address:
Center for Material and Technical Product (B4T)
Jl. Sangkuriang No.14, Bandung, 40135, INDONESIA.
Email : jurnal.tbbt@b4t.go.id
Telp : +62-22-2504088
